<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>jaux.net &#187; Java</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jaux.net/tag/java/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jaux.net</link>
	<description>Discovering this wonderful world...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 07:49:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Autoboxing Makes Java Be 99% Object-Oriented</title>
		<link>http://jaux.net/2007/10/10/autoboxing-makes-java-be-99-object-oriented/</link>
		<comments>http://jaux.net/2007/10/10/autoboxing-makes-java-be-99-object-oriented/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 07:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jaux</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaux.net/2007-10-10/autoboxing-makes-java-be-99-object-oriented/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I remember that back to the early age when I was first beginning to learn the Java programming language, there was a famous quote (in China): Java is a 95% object-oriented programming language..]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" src="http://img406.imageshack.us/img406/1303/javavd2.jpg" alt="Java" />I remember that back to the early age when I was first beginning to learn the <a href="http://java.sun.com">Java programming language</a>, there was a famous quote (in China): <q>Java is a 95% object-oriented programming language.</q>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jaux.net/2007/10/10/autoboxing-makes-java-be-99-object-oriented/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPhone Marries Java? Unlikely.</title>
		<link>http://jaux.net/2007/09/30/iphone-marries-java-unlikely/</link>
		<comments>http://jaux.net/2007/09/30/iphone-marries-java-unlikely/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 09:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jaux</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadget and Apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaux.net/2007-09-30/iphone-marries-java-unlikely/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What&#8217;s that? A blue coffee cup? A red word? Blue and red on a pure white? It&#8217;s Java&#8217;s start screen. Oh! But it&#8217;s not cool&#8230; The post &#8220;Sun tells Apple it must get Java on iPhones&#8221; says Sun feels that &#8230; <a href="http://jaux.net/2007/09/30/iphone-marries-java-unlikely/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="conversion" title="Java's start screen" style="font-style: italic;">
What&#8217;s that?<br />
A blue coffee cup?<br />
A red word?<br />
Blue and red on a pure white?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s Java&#8217;s start screen.<br />
Oh! But it&#8217;s not cool&#8230;
</p></div>
<p>The post &#8220;<a href="http://www.java-entrepreneur.com/50226711/sun_tells_apple_it_must_get_java_on_iphones.php">Sun tells Apple it must get Java on iPhones</a>&#8221; says <q cite="http://www.java-entrepreneur.com/50226711/sun_tells_apple_it_must_get_java_on_iphones.php">Sun feels that two million phones have already got Java so why not Apple iPhone&#8230;</q>. </p>
<p>I have an quick answer for the &#8220;why not&#8221;: <em>Just because 2 million phones already have Java</em>.</p>
<p>You should remember the <strong>old</strong> time, few years ago, when everybody wanted his MP3 player to have more and more fancy features. Also at that time, iPod came out. &#8220;Sorry, We don&#8217;t have FM in iPod. What?&#8221;, but you&#8217;ve seen what happened.</p>
<p><strong>Differentiation</strong>, this is the key and Apple has the key in hands since its birth. So, what I&#8217;m going to say, but don&#8217;t want to repeat (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DRY">DRY</a>), is the title.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jaux.net/2007/09/30/iphone-marries-java-unlikely/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

